Another slow week in walking with 3.5 miles Wednesday, 5 miles Saturday, and 3.5 miles today, for 32.5 for June and 165 for 2008. It's gonna be a tough push to make the last 35 miles in 11 days but I can definitely do it - might even be able to take off next Sunday to give the footsies a rest. If not, I've still made it a good way since mid-May.
Saw Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull this weekend - was surprisingly good. I'm not a huge Indy fan so it might not have lived up to the old ones, but I enjoyed it. I even liked the overall plot. Much like in Transformers, Shia LeBoeuf proves he can not ruin a role that doesn't require much. No idea if he can act beyond that. Also saw Kung Fu Panda which was fairly disappointing - no memorably clever lines or scenes. Jack Black singing Kung Fu Fighting during the credits was probably my favorite part. From a technical standpoint, the animation was great although I didn't notice any special leaps over previous animation, like the water in Lion King or similar feats.
While looking for translations of Aristophanes, I read The Black Tattoo, on a coworkers' recommendation. It's a young-adult-fiction fantasy/horror, and I really liked the story and humor but the writing never really sucked me in - I was always aware I was reading. Now I have found a modern translation of Lysistrata, which is up next for me. Then I might go back to a foreign relations textbook from UT called No Common Power. It's about the post-Cold War US superpower, which is a bit out of date, but the perspectives should still be useful to understand international issues today.
I've been frustrated recently that people don't seem to separate types of knowledge. Science by definition deals with observable verifiable repeatable data. If you can't sense something or its direct effects, it's not science. Scrap Intelligent Design in science - it's a philosophical question. I'm open to combining subjects so that philosophy of science is included in science curriculum, but only when it's specified as such. On the other hand, that also means science's authority ends when things can't be proven - evolution, the Big Bang, every scientific theory out there, doesn't disprove or prove the first thing about the supernatural. I'll posit a 3rd kind of knowledge - Truth. With the capital T, it's what's really out there, and science might get us there, religion might get us there, and which one's better or worse we'll never know (same as if they're both just distractions to divert us). So keep investigating all kinds of knowledge, keep discussing all kinds of knowledge, look for inspiration from any one field to understand another, but stop trying to compare them or use the standards of one to judge another. Why can't we all just get along?